<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Locally mounting Samba shares on Ubuntu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tim.id.au/blog/2007/05/24/locally-mounting-samba-shares-on-ubuntu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tim.id.au/blog/2007/05/24/locally-mounting-samba-shares-on-ubuntu/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:16:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.tim.id.au/blog/2007/05/24/locally-mounting-samba-shares-on-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 13:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tim.id.au/blog/?p=6#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I initially used that approach as well, but I found that my system became unstable if the network went down, and it had pending reads/writes to the remote share.

I now either use SMBFS over automount (so it doesn&#039;t have to come up on bootup, and automatically dismounts) or I use SSHFS, which uses FUSE, which seems to be more tolerant of network interruptions for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I initially used that approach as well, but I found that my system became unstable if the network went down, and it had pending reads/writes to the remote share.</p>
<p>I now either use SMBFS over automount (so it doesn&#8217;t have to come up on bootup, and automatically dismounts) or I use SSHFS, which uses FUSE, which seems to be more tolerant of network interruptions for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
